READ READ BELOW! I NEED QUALITY WORK THAT ADDRESSES EVERYTHINGUsing this information, the Assignment Rubric and the additional resources provided below, develop a 3-5 page (not including title and reference pages) APA formatted paper in a word document such as Microsoft Word. A minimum of 3 outside references must be used. MUST BE APA formatSelect an organization that you have a solid working knowledge of (an employer past or present is recommended) and conduct a SWOT analysis for that organization. Once you identify the organization’s strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats, you should then develop a strategic HRM plan to address one of the identified issues.Organization is Mount Sinai Hospital of Manhattan in NYC so do SWOT ANALYSIS OF THIS HOSPITAL AS A WHOLE! and answer the questions about the organizationUSE THIS LINK TO ADDRESS ALL and the grading system belowhttps://www.strategicmanagementinsight.com/tools/swot-analysis-how-to-do-it.htmlEach writing assignment is worth a total of 100 points. Please see the grading rubric below for additional detail and feedback on performance.CriteriaLimitedMarginalExcellentAPA Format0 to 3 pointsLimited-to-no use of APA guidelines: Paper is missing key elements of an APA formatted paper such as: Title page, in- text citations, References page. Format errors are significant and demonstrate no attempt to follow APA guidelines.4 to 8 pointsFollowed some APA guidelines: A few significant citation and/or referencing errors (e.g. separating the author and year when citing, omitting a reference title, journal name, publisher, or year, or parts of the reference are out of order. Student makes attempts at APA format for all areas of the paper. Attempt may contain errors but does not hinder the readability of the paper.9 to 10 pointsFollowed APA guidelines: Title page contain perfect or near perfect APA format. In-text citation contain perfect or near perfect APA format. APA citations with no more than minor errors such as including first initials, using “and” rather than & in a parenthetical citation, and using et al. in the first citation with 3- 5 authors. Reference page contains perfect or minimum APA references errors. Puts exact words of authors in quotation marks with name, year, and page number included. Spacing is used correctly for references and paper structure.Mechanics (free of grammatical, spelling and/or typographical errors, thoughts well-articulated and clearly presented)0 to 3 pointsWriting lacks clarity or conciseness and contains numerous errors; gives insufficient detail and relevant data and information; lacks organization4 to 8 pointsWriting is accomplished in terms of clarity and conciseness and contains only a few errors; includes sufficient details and relevant data and information; well-organized9 to 10 pointsWriting demonstrates a sophisticated clarity, conciseness, and correctness; includes thorough details and relevant data and information; extremely well-organizedFocus of Topic0 to 15 pointsLacks clear focus or topic. Missing support and analysis of issue.16 to 29 pointsFocus is somewhat clear and connects to the established topic. Submission lacks clear analysis or support to fully examine the scope of the required assignment.30 to 35 pointsSubmission has an intentional focus relevant to the area of study: Focus is clear and well-established throughout the paper. Supporting research is synthesized and used appropriately to establish relevance and support within the paper. In-depth discussion and analysis of the topic are provided.Depth of analysis, critical thinking and originality of thought0 to 15 pointsSupports diagnosis and opinions with limited reasons and evidence; presents a somewhat one-sided argument16 to 29 pointsSupports diagnosis and opinions with reasons and evidence; presents a fairly balanced view; interpretation is both reasonable and objective30 to 35 pointsSupports diagnosis and opinions with strong arguments and evidence; presents a balanced and critical view; interpretation is both reasonable and objectiveConnections0 to 3 pointsMade no connections. Lacked any elaboration.4 to 6 pointsMarginal connections: Made some connections. Minimal elaboration.7 to 10 pointsIntegrated new knowledge with prior knowledge and extended or related it to conditions within an organization or system: Made connections with current practice, prior knowledge, or other professional experiences. Made connections with relevant ideas and issues applicable to professional settings.
My WordPress Blog